|
Would another valid approach be to set up your real servers in a
heartbeat config with the 'real IP' failing between them? I know it
adds another level of configuration/complexity, but I think it would
accomplish what you're looking for.
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas
Pedoussaut
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 9:16 AM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Real and Fallback in Piranha
Sean Drill wrote:
> I am however only able to get piranha/lvs to do load sharing. In this
> case as long as both servers are set to UP, then traffic will be
> balanced between all servers (determined by load balancing scheme and
> weighting.) What I am attempting to do is create a virtual server in
> LVS, which has two active REAL servers, however direct traffic only to
> one of them, unless otherwise directed or if the active member fail,
> then direct traffic to the backup.
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
