|
Joe,
I wanted to chime in on this and ask another question. I've read the article
in the how to some time ago and my basic understanding is that if we leave the
bucket at the default there is no real fear of loosing any connections as long
as we have enough ram (as each of the buckets can have any number of
connections).
So is the assumption that large amounts of memory (2gb+) should be able to
handle pretty much an unlimited number of connections?
________________________________
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Joseph Mack NA3T
Sent: Fri 3/6/2009 4:29 AM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS Connection Hash Table Size
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Graeme Fowler wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 10:35 +0800, XUFENG wrote:
>> Is there another way to tune this parameter (IPVS connection table size)
>> besides recompiling the Linux kernel?
read the HOWTO on changing the table size
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
