|
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Gary W. Smith wrote:
> Joe,
>
> I wanted to chime in on this and ask another question.
> I've read the article in the how to some time ago and my
> basic understanding is that if we leave the bucket at the
> default there is no real fear of loosing any connections
> as long as we have enough ram (as each of the buckets can
> have any number of connections).
yes
> So is the assumption that large amounts of memory (2gb+)
> should be able to handle pretty much an unlimited number
> of connections?
a connection uses about 112 bytes (forget exactly what).
Ignoring memory taken by the kernel, apps etc, you can have
2G/112 simultaneous connections.
Changing the number of buckets doesn't change the number of
connnections that can be stored, only the number of buckets
in which they're stored.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
