lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] Help with diagnosing performance issue 60K connections graphs provided |
From: | Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:56:06 +0000 |
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 16:43 +0000, Malcolm Turnbull wrote: > Turned out it was a mixture of conntrack on the real servers filling up, Gah. Good practice: don't put LVS traffic into conntrack *unless you have to*. "man iptables", look for the "raw" table and NOTRACK target: NOTRACK This target disables connection tracking for all packets matching that rule. A Very Useful Thing Indeed, he said (adopting a Pooh-type voice). Graeme _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] Help with diagnosing performance issue 60K connections graphs provided, Malcolm Turnbull |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] CentOS 4.7 (2.6.9-based) -- LVS-NAT return packets leaving via wrong interface, Charles Duffy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] Help with diagnosing performance issue 60K connections graphs provided, Malcolm Turnbull |
Next by Thread: | [lvs-users] Generic UPD "connect" check feature for ldirectord?, Christian Balzer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |