|
Hi
Hello
192.168.225.
2
LVS IP Jboss
192.168.220.
3
LVS IP www
192.168.225.
3
srv03-jboss
192.168.225.
4
srv04-jboss
192.168.225.
5
srv05-mysql
192.168.225.
6
srv06-mysql
192.168.225.
7
LVS IP mysql
Above is my task to configure LVS with jboss and mysql clustering
I have configured lvs with TUN Below is my lvs.cf file.
serial_no = 77
primary = 192.168.220.2
service = lvs
backup = 0.0.0.0
heartbeat = 1
heartbeat_port = 539
keepalive = 6
deadtime = 18
network = tunnel
debug_level = MAX
virtual jboss {
active = 1
address = 192.168.225.2 eth0:1
vip_nmask = 255.255.255.0
port = 8080
send = "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n"
expect = "HTTP"
use_regex = 0
load_monitor = none
scheduler = rr
protocol = tcp
timeout = 6
reentry = 15
quiesce_server = 0
server jbossrs1 {
address = 192.168.225.3
active = 1
weight = 1
}
server jbossrs1 {
address = 192.168.225.4
active = 1
weight = 1
}
I am using RHEL5.3 x86_64 version with piranha.
Load balance is not working once pulse is started.
ipvsadm -ln
IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
-> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
TCP 192.168.225.2:8080 rr
Plz help me for the same as am deeply in trouble bcoz if this. Plz plz plz
plz anybody me.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:48 PM,
<lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Send lvs-users mailing list submissions to
> lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> lvs-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of lvs-users digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. lvs configuration (linuz linuz)
> 2. Re: lvs configuration (Just E. Mail)
> 3. Re: Source Hashing scheduling module (Christian Balzer)
> 4. LVS timed out error (linuz linuz)
> 5. ack (3. step of tcp handshake) from CIP does not get
> directed(dr) as expected (Axel Christiansen)
> 6. Re: ack (3. step of tcp handshake) from CIP does not get
> directed(dr) as expected (Michael Schwartzkopff)
> 7. Re: ack (3. step of tcp handshake) from CIP does not get
> directed(dr) as expected (Graeme Fowler)
> 8. Re: ack (3. step of tcp handshake) from CIP does not get
> directed(dr) as expected (Axel Christiansen)
> 9. Re: ack (3. step of tcp handshake) from CIP does not get
> directed(dr) as expected (Michael Schwartzkopff)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: linuz linuz <linuz78@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:11:45 +0530
> Subject: [lvs-users] lvs configuration
> Hi
>
> Can anybody help me for LVS configuration for below mentioned setup.
>
> I have 6 RHEL5 machines.
>
> s1, s2 and LVS ip( lvs servers and lvsip (VIP)in one network -
> 192.168.10.0).
> s3,s4 with one VIP (realservers) for port 80 and s5,s6 (realservers) with
> one VIP for port 3306 in another 192.168.20.0 network.
>
> I need to setup
>
> one lvs server serves on port 80 to s1 and s2 and from s1 and s2 it should
> connect to second LVS which load balance the db network for port 3306.
> Here LVS(directors) is in 192.168.10.0 network and all real servers in
> another 192.168.20.0 network.
>
> Am using rhel5 piranha with ipvsadm for LVS. I used lvs tun configuration
> but its not working.
> Plz help me for the same.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Just E. Mail" <justemail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <
> lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:14:31 -0600
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] lvs configuration
> Linuz:
>
>
> I am working on setting up LVS using Piranah. I have really good notes,
> whic will save you few months of pulling hair. Contact me directly:
>
> kirtib@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> and I will email them to you.
>
> Kirt
>
> =====================================
>
>
> linuz linuz wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Can anybody help me for LVS configuration for below mentioned setup.
>>
>> I have 6 RHEL5 machines.
>>
>> s1, s2 and LVS ip( lvs servers and lvsip (VIP)in one network -
>> 192.168.10.0).
>> s3,s4 with one VIP (realservers) for port 80 and s5,s6 (realservers) with
>> one VIP for port 3306 in another 192.168.20.0 network.
>>
>> I need to setup
>>
>> one lvs server serves on port 80 to s1 and s2 and from s1 and s2 it should
>> connect to second LVS which load balance the db network for port 3306.
>> Here LVS(directors) is in 192.168.10.0 network and all real servers in
>> another 192.168.20.0 network.
>>
>> Am using rhel5 piranha with ipvsadm for LVS. I used lvs tun configuration
>> but its not working.
>> Plz help me for the same.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
>> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>>
>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Christian Balzer <chibi@xxxxxxx>
> To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:19:47 +0900
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Source Hashing scheduling module
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:47:14 +0900 Mikio Kishi wrote:
>
> > Hi, Joe
> >
> > >the sh scheduler is not well understood, by the users at
> > >least (including me). Are you saying that the lc scheduler
> > >sends new connections to realservers with weight=0?
> >
> > The lc scheduler does not send new connections to realservers with
> > weight=0. ^^^^^^^^^^
> > It's ok. But, the sh one "sends" ....
> > I hope that the sh is the same with lc.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
>
> I think Kishi-san is running into the same thing I keep running into with
> SH, most recent thread would be:
> http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2009-05/msg00045.html
>
> So yes, SH will send new connections to 0 weight realservers if quiescent
> is turned on.
>
> Dewa,
>
> Christian
>
> > --
> > Mikio Kishi
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Joseph Mack NA3T<jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Mikio Kishi wrote:
> > >
> > >> I hope that the sh scheduling module doesn't select target server
> > >> whose weight is 0, like lc, sed.
> > >
> > > the sh scheduler is not well understood, by the users at
> > > least (including me). Are you saying that the lc scheduler
> > > sends new connections to realservers with weight=0?
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> > > --
> > > Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> > > jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
> > > generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
> > > Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> > > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
> > >
> > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
> >
> > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> >
>
>
> --
> Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer NOC
> chibi@xxxxxxx Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Network Services
> http://www.gol.com/
> https://secure3.gol.com/mod-pl/ols/index.cgi/?intr_id=F-2ECXvzcr6656
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: linuz linuz <linuz78@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: wengsong@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:14:59 +0530
> Subject: [lvs-users] LVS timed out error
> Hi
> I am using RHEL 5.3 with piranha for LVS configuration.
>
> I have total 6 nodes.
>
> 2 LVS server
> 2 jboss server and
> 2 mysql server all in RHEL5.3
>
> lvs1 - 192.168.220.1 - eth0
> lvs2 - 192.168.220.2 - eth0
> lvsip (VIP) - 192.168.220.3 - eth0:1
>
> jbossRIP1 - 192.168.225.3 - eth0
> jbossRIP2 - 192.168.225.4 - eth0
> jbossip (VIP) - 192.168.225.2 - eth0:1
>
> mysqlRIP1 - 192.168.225.5 - eth0
> mysqlRIP2 - 192.168.225.6 - eth0
> mysqlip (VIP) - 192.168.225.7 - eth0:1
>
> I have configured with LVS-DR with arptables as below
> lvs1:-
> 192.168.220.1 - eth0 - DIP
> 192.168.220.3 - eth0:1 - VIP
> 192.168.225.2 - eth0:2 - VIP
>
> jbossRIP1:-
> 192.168.225.3 - eth0 - RIP
> 192.168.220.3 - eth0:2 - VIP
> 192.168.225.2 - eth0:1 - VIP
> jbossRIP2:-
> 192.168.225.4 - eth0 - RIP
> 192.168.220.3 - eth0:2 - VIP
> 192.168.225.2 - eth0:1 - VIP
>
> Now am getting error as below
> Jul 13 23:31:05 srv01-www pulse[871]: gratuitous lvs arps finished
> Jul 13 23:31:06 srv01-www nanny[878]: READ to 192.168.225.3:8080 timed out
> Jul 13 23:31:06 srv01-www nanny[880]: READ to 192.168.225.4:8080 timed out
>
> Plz help me to sort out the problem. And plz correct me if am doing
> something wrong as am badly in need of help
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Axel Christiansen <christiansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:51:03 +0200
> Subject: [lvs-users] ack (3. step of tcp handshake) from CIP does not get
> directed(dr) as expected
> Hello All!
>
>
> it's for the first time i am using Ultramonkey and i got stock
> with a little problem.
>
> ________
> | |
> | client |
> |________|
> | CIP
> |
> (router)
> |
> | GEP
> (packetfilter, firewall)
> | GIP
> |
> |
> +-----------------+
> | |
> RIP1, VIP RIP2, VIP
> ____________ ____________
> | | | |
> |director1 | |director2 |
> ____________ ____________
> | | | |
> |realserver1 | |realserver2 |
> |____________| |____________|
>
>
> CIP = some inet ip
> GEP = fixed inet ip
> GIP = 217.0.0.1
> VIP = 217.0.0.10
> RIP1 = 217.0.0.101
> RIP2 = 217.0.0.102
>
>
>
>
> aw1:~# ipvsadm -ln
> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> TCP 217.0.0.10:80 rr
> -> 217.0.0.101:80 Local 1 21 2005
> -> 217.0.0.102:80 Route 1 6 678
>
>
>
>
> aw1:~# cat /etc/ha.d/haresources
> aw1.aw.int \
> ldirectord::ldirectord.cf \
> LVSSyncDaemonSwap::master \
> IPaddr2::217.0.0.10/24/eth0:1/217.0.0.255
>
>
>
>
> aw1:~# cat /etc/ha.d/ldirectord.cf
> checktimeout=10
> checkinterval=2
> autoreload=no
> logfile="local0"
> quiescent=yes
>
> virtual=217.0.0.10:80
> real=217.0.0.101:80 gate
> real=217.0.0.102:80 gate
> fallback=127.0.0.1:80 gate
> service=http
> request="ldirector.html"
> receive="Test Page"
> scheduler=rr
> protocol=tcp
> checktype=negotiate
>
>
>
>
>
> So it is a setup with director and service on the
> same hosts.
>
> It's working not too bad except for one thing. The service does
> not get balanced quite right.
>
> I do not get too much into setup details, cause i tracked down
> the problem pretty much.
>
>
> With only the active director and the traffic directed to it's
> local service, it's working fine. When having the www service on
> DIRECTOR2 turned on, the DIRECTOR1 recognizes the reachable
> www2 on DIRECTOR2 and starts distributing the sessions/sockets.
> And here the trouble starts.
>
> 1 Client send tcp syn to DIRECTOR1(vip)
> 2 DIRECTOR1 forwards tcp syn to www2
> 3 www2 answers with syn ack directly(dr) to client
> 4 Client answers with ack to DIRECTOR1(vip)
>
> NOW, that ack does not get to www2. Instead, the
> DIRECTOR1/www1 sends back an reset to Client.
>
> Thats strange. It looks like, the www1 gets the ack packet, and
> since www1 did never see a tcp syn from Client, it sends
> a reset, i gess.
>
> What am i doing wrong? Why is DIRECTOR1 forwarding the syn
> to www2, but the ack?
>
>
> For any help i would be very pleased.
>
>
> Thanks for trying to understand my problem ;)
>
>
>
> Axel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Schwartzkopff <misch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <
> lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:30:06 +0200
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] ack (3. step of tcp handshake) from CIP does not
> get directed(dr) as expected
> Am Montag, 13. Juli 2009 21:51:03 schrieb Axel Christiansen:
> > Hello All!
> >
> >
> > it's for the first time i am using Ultramonkey and i got stock
> > with a little problem.
> >
> > ________
> >
> > | client |
> > |________|
> > |
> > | CIP
> >
> > (router)
> >
> > | GEP
> >
> > (packetfilter, firewall)
> >
> > | GIP
> >
> > +-----------------+
> >
> > RIP1, VIP RIP2, VIP
> > ____________ ____________
> >
> > |director1 | |director2 |
> >
> > ____________ ____________
> >
> > |realserver1 | |realserver2 |
> > |____________| |____________|
> >
> > CIP = some inet ip
> > GEP = fixed inet ip
> > GIP = 217.0.0.1
> > VIP = 217.0.0.10
> > RIP1 = 217.0.0.101
> > RIP2 = 217.0.0.102
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > aw1:~# ipvsadm -ln
> > IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
> > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> > -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> > TCP 217.0.0.10:80 rr
> > -> 217.0.0.101:80 Local 1 21 2005
> > -> 217.0.0.102:80 Route 1 6 678
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > aw1:~# cat /etc/ha.d/haresources
> > aw1.aw.int \
> > ldirectord::ldirectord.cf \
> > LVSSyncDaemonSwap::master \
> > IPaddr2::217.0.0.10/24/eth0:1/217.0.0.255
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > aw1:~# cat /etc/ha.d/ldirectord.cf
> > checktimeout=10
> > checkinterval=2
> > autoreload=no
> > logfile="local0"
> > quiescent=yes
> >
> > virtual=217.0.0.10:80
> > real=217.0.0.101:80 gate
> > real=217.0.0.102:80 gate
> > fallback=127.0.0.1:80 gate
> > service=http
> > request="ldirector.html"
> > receive="Test Page"
> > scheduler=rr
> > protocol=tcp
> > checktype=negotiate
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > So it is a setup with director and service on the
> > same hosts.
> >
> > It's working not too bad except for one thing. The service does
> > not get balanced quite right.
> >
> > I do not get too much into setup details, cause i tracked down
> > the problem pretty much.
> >
> >
> > With only the active director and the traffic directed to it's
> > local service, it's working fine. When having the www service on
> > DIRECTOR2 turned on, the DIRECTOR1 recognizes the reachable
> > www2 on DIRECTOR2 and starts distributing the sessions/sockets.
> > And here the trouble starts.
> >
> > 1 Client send tcp syn to DIRECTOR1(vip)
> > 2 DIRECTOR1 forwards tcp syn to www2
> > 3 www2 answers with syn ack directly(dr) to client
> > 4 Client answers with ack to DIRECTOR1(vip)
> >
> > NOW, that ack does not get to www2. Instead, the
> > DIRECTOR1/www1 sends back an reset to Client.
> >
> > Thats strange. It looks like, the www1 gets the ack packet, and
> > since www1 did never see a tcp syn from Client, it sends
> > a reset, i gess.
> >
> > What am i doing wrong? Why is DIRECTOR1 forwarding the syn
> > to www2, but the ack?
> >
> >
> > For any help i would be very pleased.
> >
> >
> > Thanks for trying to understand my problem ;)
> >
> >
> >
> > Axel
>
> Hi,
>
> Did you turn off arp_announce on the real servers? See:
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.arp_problem.html
>
> Did you trace the packages with tcpdump, includung for all correct MAC
> addresses?
> tcpdump -net -i ...
>
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
> MultiNET Services GmbH
> Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany
> Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0
> Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21
> mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75
>
> mail: misch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> web: www.multinet.de
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 114375
> Geschäftsführer: Günter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens
>
> ---
>
> PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B
> Skype: misch42
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <
> lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:32:33 +0100
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] ack (3. step of tcp handshake) from CIP does not
> get directed(dr) as expected
> On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 21:51 +0200, Axel Christiansen wrote:
> > What am i doing wrong? Why is DIRECTOR1 forwarding the syn
> > to www2, but the ack?
>
> I would hazard a guess that this is to do with your firewall. Can you
> try the setup with the firewall switched off and see what happens?
>
> Regards
>
> Graeme
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Axel Christiansen <christiansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <
> lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:14:50 +0200
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] ack (3. step of tcp handshake) from CIP does not
> get directed(dr) as expected
>
> Did you turn off arp_announce on the real servers? See:
>> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.arp_problem.html
>>
>
> Yes, for all Interfaces.
>
> net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding = 1
> net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
> net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_ignore = 1
> net.ipv4.conf.eth0.arp_ignore = 1
> net.ipv4.conf.eth1.arp_ignore = 1
> net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_announce = 2
> net.ipv4.conf.eth0.arp_announce = 2
> net.ipv4.conf.eth1.arp_announce = 2
>
>
>
>> Did you trace the packages with tcpdump, includung for all correct MAC
>> addresses?
>> tcpdump -net -i ...
>>
>
> Yes, used tcpdump, but without paying atentione to mac addresses.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Schwartzkopff <misch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <
> lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:18:42 +0200
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] ack (3. step of tcp handshake) from CIP does not
> get directed(dr) as expected
> Am Dienstag, 14. Juli 2009 12:14:50 schrieb Axel Christiansen:
> > > Did you turn off arp_announce on the real servers? See:
> > >
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.arp_problem.html
> >
> > Yes, for all Interfaces.
> >
> > net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding = 1
> > net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
> > net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_ignore = 1
> > net.ipv4.conf.eth0.arp_ignore = 1
> > net.ipv4.conf.eth1.arp_ignore = 1
> > net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_announce = 2
> > net.ipv4.conf.eth0.arp_announce = 2
> > net.ipv4.conf.eth1.arp_announce = 2
> >
> > > Did you trace the packages with tcpdump, includung for all correct MAC
> > > addresses?
> > > tcpdump -net -i ...
> >
> > Yes, used tcpdump, but without paying atentione to mac addresses.
>
> but when you have correct arp_ignore and arp_announce that should not be
> the
> problem.
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
> MultiNET Services GmbH
> Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany
> Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0
> Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21
> mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75
>
> mail: misch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> web: www.multinet.de
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 114375
> Geschäftsführer: Günter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens
>
> ---
>
> PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B
> Skype: misch42
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lvs-users mailing list
> lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
