LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

[lvs-users] In existing setup LocalDirector real servers don't use LD as

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lvs-users] In existing setup LocalDirector real servers don't use LD as gateway, why?
From: devnull <devnull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:52:33 -0700
I'm using LVS-NAT, from the documentation is says its based on cisco's
LocalDirector.

Goal is to basically remove the antiquated LocalDirector (has been
discontinued a while ago), and replace it with LVS-NAT. However, the real
servers in the current configuration do not use the local director as their
gateway, they use the firewall which is on the same subnet.

[Internet] ----> [Firewall] (172.16.1.1) ---> [Local Director] (172.16.1.5)
----> {Switch} ---->  [Real Server] (172.16.1.55)

The real servers gateway is 172.16.1.1,

I understand why the real server would need the LVS-NAT as its gateway, but
im looking for a solution that can just replace the LocalDirector, is
LVS-NAT not what I'm looking for?

Thanks,


Kyle
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>