|
LVS-NAT requires the Director to be its Gateway.
I think you are looking for LVS-DR.
That should do what you need.
Good luck!
-Philip
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM, devnull <devnull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm using LVS-NAT, from the documentation is says its based on cisco's
> LocalDirector.
>
> Goal is to basically remove the antiquated LocalDirector (has been
> discontinued a while ago), and replace it with LVS-NAT. However, the real
> servers in the current configuration do not use the local director as their
> gateway, they use the firewall which is on the same subnet.
>
> [Internet] ----> [Firewall] (172.16.1.1) ---> [Local Director] (172.16.1.5)
> ----> {Switch} ----> [Real Server] (172.16.1.55)
>
> The real servers gateway is 172.16.1.1,
>
> I understand why the real server would need the LVS-NAT as its gateway, but
> im looking for a solution that can just replace the LocalDirector, is
> LVS-NAT not what I'm looking for?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Kyle
> _______________________________________________
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
