|
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:37:32AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> > > looking at
> > >
> > > kernel: IPVS: template lookup/in IP 160.124.109.65:0->0.0.0.0:0 not hit
> > >
> > > daddr=0.0.0.0 shows that fwmark is not provided at the
> > > right place, so the user just needs to upgrade or to apply
> > > the patch from May, 2009:
> > >
> > > http://marc.info/?t=124050022700001&r=1&w=2
> >
> > Hi Julian,
> >
> > I've been able to reproduce the problem that Deon reported
> > with 2.6.30, which includes the change above, so I think
> > that it is a separate problem.
>
> It is still not clear to me whether Deon needed just 2.6.30
> or your latest change was needed. I don't see how ipvsadm 1.25
> can provide virtual port without -t/-u options. What is your
> ipvsadm command line that reproduces this svc port problem in
> 2.6.30? May be you have both -f and -t/-u ?
>From memory, I simply tried something like:
ipvsadm -A -t 1
ipvsadm -a -t 1 -r 10.0.0.1:80
and then later
ipvsadm -A -t 1
ipvsadm -a -t 1 -r 10.0.0.1:0
I'll try and retest this.
> > That said, Deon also needs to change above, "ipvs: Fix IPv4 FWMARK virtual
> > services", as he is using more than one fwmark.
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
