Do you think the size of UDP buffer is enough?
Patch for lower pause was in previous message but how to use a dynamic
pause?
Regards, Aleksey
-----Original Message-----
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 02:07:12AM +0200, Aleksey Chudov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have the following parameters set on LVS Master:
> net.core.wmem_max = 16777216
> net.core.wmem_default = 118784
> net.core.rmem_max = 16777216
> net.core.rmem_default = 118784
>
> # netstat -s
> Udp:
> 12669936 packets received
> 398141 packets to unknown port received.
> 0 packet receive errors
> 47229187 packets sent
> RcvbufErrors: 0
> SndbufErrors: 29490577
>
>
> How to know correct buffer parameters for 16k conn/ps?
> Is it possible to fix connection sync daemon messages without recompiling
> the krenel?
I wonder if the kernel should be fixed to a) use a lower pause between
batches of sends (its currently HZ = 1s) or b) use a dynamic pause depending
on many packets are being handled.
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|