|
Thanks for the response and sorry for messing up the thread formatting
;)
Now I've started to look more into it, it shouldn't be too difficult.
The ldirectord resource agent in Pacemaker needs changing to a
multi-state RA so it can run in slave mode, then ldirectord itself needs
to take another argument to just start the sync daemon.
I'll have a go at implementing this and submit it to Pacemaker.
Cheers
Darren
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Horman [mailto:horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 December 2009 03:20
To: Darren Mansell
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS Sync in Ldirectord
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:37:11AM -0000, Darren.Mansell@xxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
> This doesn't seem to be in ldirectord, and it would seem to be a nice
> addition.
>
>
>
> Has anyone looked at implementing this?
Hi,
the major problem that I have had with implementing this in the past is
that
a) the sync daemons are typically used when LVS is deployed in
a master/stand-by configuration.
b) ldirectord typically only runs on the master
For this reason I think that its better to start the sync daemons
independent of ldirectord.
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
