Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR on default gateway

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR on default gateway
From: "Dennis J." <dennisml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:37:46 +0100
On 01/20/2010 10:29 PM, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Dennis J. wrote:
>> I'm not dealing with the arp problem but the martian problem that only
>> occurs when the director is also the default gateway/router.
>> I'm wondering though why Red Hat recommends using aprtables_jf when adding
>> a few lines to sysctl.conf seems to be so much simpler and less invasive.
> martians are discussed in the HOWTO for setting up an LVS-DR
> director which is a gateway

Yes but the patch mentioned there is from 2001 and the bridging approach 
has a lot to say about network theory but doesn't provide a specific 
example how to configure such a setup.
What I'm looking for is a way to tell the gateway to not throw away these 
martian packets. Something along the lines of "iptables -t nat -A 


Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>