Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR on default gateway

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR on default gateway
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:29:48 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Dennis J. wrote:

> I'm not dealing with the arp problem but the martian problem that only
> occurs when the director is also the default gateway/router.
> I'm wondering though why Red Hat recommends using aprtables_jf when adding
> a few lines to sysctl.conf seems to be so much simpler and less invasive.

martians are discussed in the HOWTO for setting up an LVS-DR 
director which is a gateway

I wouldn't assume there's a good reason for why RH does it 
that way. Possibly it's to be compatible with something else 
they're doing


Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at
Homepage It's GNU/Linux!

Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>