LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] what logic am I missing? cause I don't see any benefits!

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] what logic am I missing? cause I don't see any benefits!
From: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:12:08 +0100
William,

Try more than one test client.
Also LVS will slightly increase latency on new connections (one extra
hop), total performance will increase though.



On 27 June 2010 18:25, William Ottley <williamottley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>

>
> In theory, I should get the same amount of latency, which would be between
> 250ms and 550ms, right?
> I don't. I get somewhere from 750ms to 950ms...
> This is the exact latency as if I put 600 threads on each individual
> webserver...
>
> So what is it i'm missing here???
>


-- 
Regards,

Malcolm Turnbull.

Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>