|
The current stats output is as follows
Prot LocalAddress:Port Conns InPkts OutPkts InBytes
OutBytes
TCP 192.168.2.1:80 1877189 39344549 0 11215M
0
-> 192.168.2.8:80 599836 25601414 0 7877M
0
-> 192.168.2.5:80 1277353 13743135 0 3338M
0
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 16:20 +0530, Graeme Fowler wrote:
> Hi
>
> Firstly, your reply to the list didn't go through because somehow you
> mangled the address.
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 16:09 +0530, Himanshu Raina wrote:
> > I understood the connection establishment and the termination part. So
> > one way of dealing with this is to assign weights accordingly. Knowing
> > that the server with higher weight processes request much faster you
> > should assign maximum weight to it. Like in my case when I changed the
> > weight from 7:3 to 9:1 the number of active connections reduced on the
> > server which was earlier having higher number of active connections and
> > every new connection in this case was given to the server with higher
> > weight. Correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Please supply the --stats output as requested after running for a while.
> The "snapshot" view of active/inactive connections is not very helpful
> in this discussion.
>
> The faster server can move more connections more quickly from active to
> inactive than the slower, so can appear to be handling fewer connections
> when viewed in this way. You need to look at the "big picture" after
> it's been running for a while to get a true view of how requests are
> being spread between realservers.
>
> Graeme
>
--
Regards,
Himanshu Raina
--
A great empire, like a great cake, is most easily diminished at the edges.
-- B. Franklin
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
