So .8 is "slow" and .5 is "fast", yes?
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 16:29 +0530, Himanshu Raina wrote:
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Conns InPkts OutPkts InBytes OutBytes
> TCP 192.168.2.1:80 1877189 39344549 0 11215M 0
> -> 192.168.2.8:80 599836 25601414 0 7877M 0
> -> 192.168.2.5:80 1277353 13743135 0 3338M 0
That makes sense for the "conns" statistic, where slow:fast are in an
approximate ratio of 30:70. This makes perfect sense.
The packet and byte counters, however, look slightly unusual in that
they are in opposition - slow:fast 65:35.
As these are webservers, are they running the same server version with
the same configuration? I'll hazard a guess here that the "slow" server
has HTTP KeepAlives turned on, where the "fast" server does not...
Graeme
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|