LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] High Traffic IMAP deployment

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] High Traffic IMAP deployment
From: Faisal Ghulam <f.ghulam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:06:01 +0500
Just share yours experience about deployment of LVS with SMTP,IMAP/POP3.
if we used only 500 Mb/s traffic to one LVS then what we will have to do for
achieve it behind Postfix as SMTP and
Dovecot as IMAP/POP3.




On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Timo Schoeler
<timo.schoeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> thus David Lang spake:
> > I missed the beginning of this thread
> > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> thus Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa spake:
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Faisal Ghulam <f.ghulam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>> I want to deploy LVS for highly traffic IMAP,POP3 .
> >>>>
> >>>> Can any one guide me how to get it with Centos 5.3.
> >>>>
> >>>> My backend Email server is Postfix.
> >>> Postfix handles SMTP, not IMAP/POP3.  I use dovecot for IMAP/POP3, but
> >>> I'm more interested on security than performance, so..... maybe
> >>> someone else can suggest a faster IMAP server (although dovecot is not
> >>> slow, I think, just for the record).
> >> Dovecot is one of the best performing (if not *the* best performing)
> >> pop/imap servers out there. Just use the search egine you like for
> >> benchmark comparisons, and you'll get a bunch of results that will show
> >> this, on different OSes (may it be GNU/Linux, xBSD, or whatever).
> >
> > take a look at Cyrus, it is _very_ scalable, and includes replication and
> > clustering capabilities. It's routinely used by universities and other
> larger
> > organizations.
>
> Cyrus is a nice player in the field (still run it myself on some hosts),
> but it has some major drawbacks:
>
> - - proprietary mail storage mechanism (compared to MailDir/mbox et al.)
>
> - - slower than Dovecot, e.g.
>
> - - compared to other pop/imap servers, it does not implement RFCs as good
> as others (Dovecot is very good here, too)
>
> > David Lang
>
> HTH,
>
> Timo
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFMY7FUfg746kcGBOwRAlK/AJsELko4InWqRPWQg725pexJuyTKfACfTNio
> NSQQY24vTL62OSjPsoS8nTs=
> =OT+5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>