LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Kernel 2.6.35 and 100% S.I. CPU Time

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Kernel 2.6.35 and 100% S.I. CPU Time
From: "楷子狐" <higkoo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:43:48 +0800
I had see this problem before :
  
  http://hi.baidu.com/higkoo/blog/item/f8943c60d16843d28cb10d17.html
  ------------------
   
 


  
   
  
  ------------------ Original ------------------
  From:  "JL"<lvs@xxxxxxxx>;
 Date:  Sun, Sep 12, 2010 06:29 PM
 To:  "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing 
list."<lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
 
 Subject:  [lvs-users] Kernel 2.6.35 and 100% S.I. CPU Time

  
Hi,

I have recently upgraded from kernel 2.6.27.45 to 2.6.35.4.

Now, any machine which is a backup (that is, receiving connection
updates from another machine) goes to nearly 100% CPU time in Soft
Interrupt.

Profiling the kernel shows the largest portion of time is spent in nf_iterate.

We are using FWMARK rules to specify traffic for LVS.

Is this problem something people are aware of? Does anyone know of a
fix or workaround?

Thanks,
-- 
Jarrod Lowe

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>