|
Op 19-10-2010 15:19, Graeme Fowler schreef:
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:56 +0200, Dirk Bonenkamp - Bean IT wrote:
>> I still don't know what exactly the problem was with LVS-NAT...
> Very likely that iptables/netfilter conntrack module was also processing
> the VIP traffic, adding to the latency. Obviously that's only true if
> you're using a conntrack module, but this is often the default on NAT
> directors.
>
This wasn't the issue AFAIK. The conntrack modules where not loaded.
They do get loaded when adding extra NAT rules trough iptables, but when
only using LVS-NAT, they don't get loaded. The tests where done without
the modules loaded.
Dirk
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
