Op 19-10-2010 15:19, Graeme Fowler schreef:
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:56 +0200, Dirk Bonenkamp - Bean IT wrote:
>> I still don't know what exactly the problem was with LVS-NAT...
> Very likely that iptables/netfilter conntrack module was also processing
> the VIP traffic, adding to the latency. Obviously that's only true if
> you're using a conntrack module, but this is often the default on NAT
This wasn't the issue AFAIK. The conntrack modules where not loaded.
They do get loaded when adding extra NAT rules trough iptables, but when
only using LVS-NAT, they don't get loaded. The tests where done without
the modules loaded.
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users