|
Thanks a lot Joe, much appreciated.
This make sense of what I am seeing. I'll try to get this working
tonight and see if there is any useful information/documentation I can
provide back if there is any missing.
I can see why this isn't that common of a use-case/topic.
Cheers!
Tim
On 21/03/11 12:04 PM, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Tim Vaillancourt wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks Joe,
>>
>> I see what you're saying.
>>
>> Would you expect this to work if I used say the same TCP 9000 across
>> several lo:0 intefaces?
>>
> not sure. This has been talked about before. Look for
> "127.0.0.2" in these sections
>
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.rewrite_ports.html#localnode_cant_rewrite_ports
>
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.virtualised_realservers.html#vwmare
>
> this same reference to 127.0.0.2 is also mentioned in
>
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.localnode.html#two_node_localnode
>
> but AFAIK, no-one has used it.
>
> Let me know if it does/doesn't work so I can write it up
>
> Joe
>
>
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
