|
On 23.10.2011 22:47, David Coulson wrote:
> What happens if you remove the ipvsadm rules on the host which does not
> have the VIP active on eth0 on it?
Then, no flood, works great.
However, I'd rather have the rules set on both hosts, since it normally
simplifies the setup (no need to reconfigure ipvsadm rules if the IP
failsover etc.).
> Sounds like both systems are running the packet through LVS and routing
> it back and forth. I guess you could implement it with FWM and have it
> not match packets coming from the MAC of the other director.
Hmm, any more hints on such a rule?
> When I've done a two-node environment with director and real on the same
> box, I've always ran a private interconnect between them and routed
> traffic over that.
No such luck here!
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
