|
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 08:45:53AM +0000, Dean Scothern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a little confused when you talk about 'the patch'
>
> Is this the section that is relevant:
> https://github.com/horms/ipvs/tree/v2.6.35.4-ipvs-backport/include/net
A patch is a method of describing changes to a tree of source code.
I believe that the patch you are after is "ipvs: changes for local real server".
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/horms/ipvs.git;a=patch;h=fc604767613b6d2036cdc35b660bc39451040a47
Looking over the logs, you may also want to consider the following
subsequent patches:
* ipvs: changes for local client
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/horms/ipvs.git;a=patch;h=cb59155f21d4c0507d2034c2953f6a3f7806913d
* ipvs: restore support for iptables SNAT
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/horms/ipvs.git;a=patch;h=afb523c54718da57ff661950bd3287ec9eeb66bd
> I'm trying to get the behaviour working on a rhel/centos 6 kernel which is
> based on 2.6.32.
>
> To my unpractised eye the differences between ipvs on vanilla 2.6.32.4 and
> 2.6.35.4 do not seem too great. It seems involved on adding SCTP support.
> I'm hoping (probably futile) that I might be able to use the files in the url
> above with little or no alteration.
> Is that a vain hope?
There do seem to be some more changes, but nothing that seems particularly
relevant.
> Also to clarify, the new behaviour is that for ipvs nat to a IP on the
> node, the application needs to listen on the RIP and not the VIP?
If you use the MASQ forwarding mechanism and the RIP
is a local IP address on the director, then it will be handled locally.
In this case the RIP and the VIP may be the same address.
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
