|
Hello,
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Aleksey Chudov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think we can start tests at this week. Before start testing I have a
> couple of questions:
> 1. Is new connection sync compatible with the previous version? So, should I
> patch both master and slave nodes or just master?
You can patch just the master, nothing in the backup
function is changed. By default, the sync_threshold values
have effect because sync_refresh_period defaults to 0. There
are some differences for master, eg. template conns are synced
every time, not once per sysctl_sync_period as before now for
version 1. There are also other changes, for example,
sync_threshold values now work for closing states too,
in case connection is closed one-way only. Sync can be
also sent when connection lifetime is extended on expiration.
> 2. Should I use schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ/10) to prevent
> SndbufErrors or perform tests with the original values?
Yes, use HZ/10 until a better solution is found.
I think, this is the next thing to implement.
> Regards,
> Aleksey
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
