|
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 08:42:25AM +0100, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Traditionally IPVS-NAT has worked in the form of destination-NAT,
> > that is modifying the destination IP address to that of the real-server.
> > This works well for in a wide range of circumstances.
> >
> > More recently Full NAT support was added. This modifies
> > source IP address to that of the linux-director as well
> > as the destination IP address to that of the selected real-server.
>
> So the linux-director does not have to be the default-gw for the real-servers
> anymore with Full-NAT?
Return packets still need to travel through the linux-director
as the Full-NAT as the address translations need to be reversed.
> > An example of where full NAT may be useful is if a real-server wants to
> > access a virtual service handled by the linux-director of the real-server.
>
> Stefan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
