LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Difference between NAT and FullNAT - help needed

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Difference between NAT and FullNAT - help needed
From: Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 08:58:11 +0100
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von:    Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > So the linux-director does not have to be the default-gw for the 
> real-servers anymore with Full-NAT?
> > 
> > Return packets still need to travel through the linux-director
> > as the Full-NAT as the address translations need to be reversed.
> 
> Sorry, I missed your point. As the return packets will be addressed
> to the linux-director I think that you are correct and that a
> default (or other) route via the linux-director should not be necessary.

Thank you. now i have the last piece of puzzle ;)

Stefan

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>