Re: [lvs-users] fallback server getting conn. refused

To: "L.S. Keijser" <leon@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] fallback server getting conn. refused
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 23:01:44 +0200 (EET)

On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, L.S. Keijser wrote:

> Hi,
> On a production server with a HUGE firewall list (thanks, Shorewall!) we
> have LVS configured and up & running. All works well, except when all
> realservers are down and ldirectord switches to fallback:
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
>   -> RemoteAddress:Port           Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> TCP wlc
>   ->                 Route   1      0          59
>   ->               Masq    0      0          0
> First of all, I remembered that when switching to fallback, the forward
> method said 'Local' in the past, and now it displays Route. But okay,
> perhaps this is the new syntax.
> The problem is that we're getting connection refused messages.
> Telnetting on the director to localhost:80 works fine though. 
> Anyone with some advice?

        The Route mode preserves the packet addresses,
so you need a local listener, the test with
localhost:80 is not adequate. IIRC, the Local mode worked
in the same way.


Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>

Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>