LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] the network structure of DR mode ?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] the network structure of DR mode ?
Cc: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Horst Venzke-Fa Remsnet Ltd" <support@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:33:56 +0100 (CET)
Dear Hatt Tom,

I may assume you compare  other Comercial like Brocade ADX series  with Linux 
LVS DR Mode.
Older Brocade ADX series  work allmost equal to Linux LVS NAT.
I had an  new Brocade 2k  ADX cluster in my hands end last year , 
they still require an "transfer network(natting  the realservers)" when 
streched accross Datacenters.

Thus - Linux LVS Directors are not equal  as Brocade Directors.

At Linux LVS NAT  the Realserver access public network  through/from lvs 
director witch cause also creating BIG Network Load on lvs director .
Thus for that the sizing of Linux LVS NAT Directors will be Big  system 
resources.

At LVS DR  only handel the packet redirect managment, NO NATTING , NOT beeing 
default router for realservers,
and most Impressive :  cause NOT creating big network Load on lvs director .

LVS DR in that way the Most impressive Steaming Tech :
With an smal ( Thin ) Linux DR LB systems < 512MB  ram you can Overload an 
Public +1G line without near ZERO CPU load on the LB , but busy Realservers ;-) 
. 




--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards

Horst Venzke ; PGP NET : 1024G/082F2E6D ;  http://www.remsnet.de

Legal Notice: This transmittal and/or attachments may be privileged or 
confidential. It is intended solely for the addressee named above. Any review, 
dissemination, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you received this 
transmittal in error, please notify us immediately by reply and immediately 
delete this message and all its attachments. Thank you.


> Gesendet: Freitag, 03. Januar 2014 um 16:41 Uhr
> Von: "Malcolm Turnbull" <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> An: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." 
> <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Betreff: Re: [lvs-users] the network structure of DR mode ?
>
> Yes, in fact it usually has to (director is not usually the gateway in DR 
> mode).
> 
> 
> On 3 January 2014 14:07, Hatt Tom <net.study.sea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Regulary  with LVS DR ..  LB´s and Realservers been connected to the SAME 
> >> Network using the same  network( layer 2/3 )switch(s).
> >
> > does this mean that realserver can access public network not through
> > lvs director ?
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Malcolm Turnbull.
> 
> Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
> Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
> http://www.loadbalancer.org/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
> 
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>

Attachment: addressbook.vcf
Description: Vcard

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>