support@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> From: "Ferenc Wagner" <wferi@xxxxxxx>
>
>> support@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>>> I can´t understand why Debian , Suse , FC / Redhat and it´s clones
>>> Distrubtions still publish the buggy ipvsadm 1.26 .
>>
>> The change of distribution location may play a role in this. The latest
>> tarballs at http://www.linux-vs.org/software/kernel-2.6/ are of version 1.26.
>> See for example https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775930.
>
> Thanks Ferry ,
> to explain why Debian are 5 years behind the Mainsteam at IPVS - and
> clones as well.
>
> and yes see the Anouncment of the ipvsadm 1.27 at the "lvs-user" list,
>
> The ipvsadm Tarball Distribution had been changed at 2013 , an GIT
> repro exist since then from
>
> http://www.linux-vs.org/software/kernel-2.6/ to
> https://kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/ipvsadm
>
> Julian, Me and others HAD written Notices to distrib mainta8iners -
> but that seems been ignored.
Not arguing here. I tried to provide some explanation, not an excuse.
The Debian watch file certainly points to the old location.
--
Regards,
Feri.
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|