|
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> support@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > From: "Ferenc Wagner" <wferi@xxxxxxx>
> >
> >> support@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> >>
> >>> I can´t understand why Debian , Suse , FC / Redhat and it´s clones
> >>> Distrubtions still publish the buggy ipvsadm 1.26 .
> >>
> >> The change of distribution location may play a role in this. The latest
> >> tarballs at http://www.linux-vs.org/software/kernel-2.6/ are of version
> >> 1.26.
> >> See for example https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775930.
> >
> > Thanks Ferry ,
> > to explain why Debian are 5 years behind the Mainsteam at IPVS - and
> > clones as well.
> >
> > and yes see the Anouncment of the ipvsadm 1.27 at the "lvs-user" list,
> >
> > The ipvsadm Tarball Distribution had been changed at 2013 , an GIT
> > repro exist since then from
> >
> > http://www.linux-vs.org/software/kernel-2.6/ to
> > https://kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/ipvsadm
> >
> > Julian, Me and others HAD written Notices to distrib mainta8iners -
> > but that seems been ignored.
>
> Not arguing here. I tried to provide some explanation, not an excuse.
> The Debian watch file certainly points to the old location.
googling for ipvsadm also doesn't help. It doesn't give you any hint of the
new location.
Alex
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
