lvs-users
|
|
lvs-users
|
| To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] Do Higher Persistence Values Cause Higher Resource Utilization? |
| From: | Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:44:49 +0100 |
Eric, I'm not 100% certain, but I can't imagine this causing any performance issues. We've certainly never had any customer issues with large client bases and high persistence timeouts. -- Regards, Malcolm Turnbull. Loadbalancer.org Ltd. Phone: +44 (0)330 380 1064 http://www.loadbalancer.org/ _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [lvs-users] Do Higher Persistence Values Cause Higher Resource Utilization?, Eric Robinson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] Do Higher Persistence Values Cause Higher Resource Utilization?, Eric Robinson |
| Previous by Thread: | [lvs-users] Do Higher Persistence Values Cause Higher Resource Utilization?, Eric Robinson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] Do Higher Persistence Values Cause Higher Resource Utilization?, Eric Robinson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |