LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Setting up a one network VS-NAT LVS

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Setting up a one network VS-NAT LVS
From: "Ivan Figueredo" <idf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:41:25 -0600
Julian,

If your time allows, please give me *very* specific instructions on what to
type and I will get the output to you right away.

Sorry, I do not have the expertise you require.

Ivan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Anastasov" <ja@xxxxxx>
To: "Ivan Figueredo" <idf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: Setting up a one network VS-NAT LVS


>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Ivan Figueredo wrote:
>
> > Well, now I am kinda confused, becasue I did what Joe said (thx Joe!!)
and
> > now the thing is working!!??
> >
> > So, just to clarify, what exaclty is the "masquerading?" (I will RTFM in
the
> > meantime.)
> >
> > My setup is:
> >
> > client - 192.168.168.5
> > director - 192.168.168.2
> > real - 192.168.168.3
> >
> > I did as described by joe's e-mail and my previous postings, and this
works,
> > i.e., when I browse to 192.168.168.2, I get the 192.168.168.3 website.
If I
> > try to browse 192.168.168.3 directly, it hangs.
>
> This is with deleted link route? I.e. 192.168.168.3/24 configured
> on the real server and then the 192.168.168.0/24 route deleted? Can you
> tcpdump in the director and in the real server?
>
> > Perhaps I misunderstood - Please clarify.
>
> I'm not sure what you exactly configure. A tcpdump output will
> be enough.
>
> > Ivan
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>