LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Is piranha enough?

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is piranha enough?
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:44:17 +1100
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 05:44:09PM -0800, VINOD wrote:
>  Dear All,
>         I have two real servers with a single virtual server , , I have 
> installed the Red Hat 6.2 Full installation , which involves ipvsadm,  
> piranha , piranha GUI, and piranha doc . NO extra packages have been tried so 
> far.
>         My first question
>                 Are these packages sufficient for a load balancing cluster ? 

That should be sufficient. For piranha specific questions you 
may want to investigate  piranha-list@xxxxxxxxxx

>         Now my second question?
> My setup is like this ,
>        
> Real server1
>         eth0 :192.168.1.2
>         default gateway :192.168.1.254
> Real server2
>         eth0:1921.168.1.3
>         default gateway: 192.168.1.254
> Director
>         eth0 :151.8.105.105
>         eth0:0 :151.8.106.106  (my virtual IP)
>         eth1: 192.168.1.1
>         eth1:0 :192.168.1.254
>        
>  I configured my Apache in my both the real servers identically, with the 
> server names 192.168.1.2 & 192.168.1.3 respectively   Virtual server 
> configuration in Piranha is like this ..
>     Virtual server ip : 151.8.105.105                   

Shouldn't this be 151.8.105.106 ?

In which case you would connect to http://151.8.105.105/ (or an equivalent
DNS name) from 151.8.100.100.

>         Server type : http
>                 Real server1 : 192.168.1.2 : 80
>                 Real server2 : 192.168.1.3 : 80
>  Now to my second question  : I am not getting my web page from the public 
> network server 151.8.100.100 . Instead I am getting the default page in the 
> Apache running on my director. I am getting the error as this 
> 
> ""    Connection was refused by the server
>       Either the server is not recieving the requests or may be busy ...   """
>               
>       I am getting the same from my director even . I checked with my
>       real servers there the web servers are running normally. What could
>       be the wrong? 

-- 
Horms
        


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>