LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: FW: LVS-Tun and Fwmarks

To: Jeff <golfer2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: FW: LVS-Tun and Fwmarks
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "mack@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <mack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 16:05:17 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Jeff wrote:

> I sure have. 

OK. it's hard to tell sometimes.

> If fact, that's where I first noticed section 7.9 "fwmark
> allows LVS-DR director to be default gw for realservers".  

That's what it's supposed to do. I can't remember offhand what examples 
are in there. 

> I've attempted to
> emulate the examples provided, but I seem to be missing something.  (Of
> course, I am using Tun instead of DR.)

Should still work. You're doing two things at once, setting up with fwmark
and then Tun. You could try with DR first to check, and with just
accepting packets via a VIP rather than the fwmark. 

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack, mack@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Virtual Server project
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>