LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: FW: LVS-Tun and Fwmarks

To: <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: FW: LVS-Tun and Fwmarks
Cc: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mack@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <mack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jeff" <golfer2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 11:35:31 -0400
I removed the VIP on the director so that I could use the Director as the
default gateway for the Real Servers.

-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Julian
Anastasov
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 1:36 PM
To: Jeff
Cc: mack@xxxxxxxxxxxx; lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: FW: LVS-Tun and Fwmarks



        Hello,

On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Jeff wrote:

> Can you provide me with the proper syntax to setup the local route using
> "ip"?  (For comparison purposes, it would be interesting to see the
> "iptables" command too.)
>
> Setting up this local route seems to be where I'm going wrong.

The local routes play for transparent proxy, for example:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=101674735204704&w=2

        You don't need them. Your setup needs just existing
VIP on director:

ifconfig eth0:1 90.0.0.35 netmask 255.255.255.255

        Something wrong with this approach? Why you removed the
VIP when switched to fwmark service?

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>


_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>