Re: module problem

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: module problem
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 09:07:12 +0900
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 11:55:50PM +0800, Wensong Zhang wrote:

Hi Wensong,

> The sltv2.index and sltv2.index are not consistent with sltimer_jiffies 
> too. So, the actual timer expiration delay is the number of jiffies/100 
> at the time of loading ipvs module.

Ahh I missed that, we could initialise them too.
Though I agree that an easier way would be to just remove
the line that initaliases sltimer_jiffies.
It is probably only an advantage if the lvs module
is loaded a _long_ time after the system boots.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>