|
Hi Rainer,
I cannot say more about this. I also cannot believe this too.
But, what make i wrong???
What about the hidden kernelpatch. Is this right, that i don't need
this, because i use NAT? Or should i use still use it?
no needs for NAT topology.
Now, i have tried following packages:
* Native Kernel 2.4.21 with ipvs patch
* Ultra Monkey Kernel
first I would highly recommand using a vanilla 2.4.21 with the latest ipvs
patch. No more no less. Then try using ipvsadm tool stetting a static LVS
topology. Then when your static LVS topology is working try to introduce
some complexity using ultra monkey or Keepalived. But first read the nice
joe's LVS-mini-HOWTO section 4.2.
A question on all who use lvs correctly for years:
Which hardware and software do you use ( versions, patches, config, ...
)???
Standard Intel box. vanilla kernel with ipvs patch (for NAT).
I cannot believe, that i must buy an blackbox for this task. But i have
no idea, what i make wrong.
Best regards,
Alexandre
| 