LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS and dynamic routing

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS and dynamic routing
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 06:40:57 -0400
James Couzens wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 14:06, Patrick LeBoutillier wrote:

> > My question is: if heartbeat starts and brings up the alias on eth0 and
> > then
> > the network eth0 is connected to fails, will the director still be able to
> > deal with the packets even if they start coming in from eth1?

> 
> keepalived handles effortlessly the functionality you have outlined in
> your post quoted above, 

Hi James,
        How does keepalived handle the situation where packets need to
go in and out eth1 after failure of routing on eth0 (but eth0 is still UP)

        Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>