LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS-Tun arp-encounter

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jmack@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: LVS-Tun arp-encounter
From: Matt Chan <engineuity@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:08:21 -0500
Thank you very much!!! That fixed everything, and my director is now load
balancing perfectly.

-Matt Chan

On 1/20/06, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Nick Silkey wrote:
>
> > Matt Chan wrote:
> >> I was able to see connections as inactive on ipvsadm -L, but the client
> >> never actually accesses the webserver. Am I using the arp_ignore and
> >> arp_announce flags correctly?
>
> do you have this correct?
>
>
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-DR.html#set_rp_filter
>
> some of the market enhanced linux kernels have changed the
> default
>
> Joe
>
> >
> > I see the same issue, with a little different settings.  I am working on
> with
> > 2 x directors, 3 x worker bees in an LVS-DR environment.  Currently all
> > systems are RHEL4 and UltraMonkey3 has been running on the
> directors.  The
> > closest that UM3 comes to working in this environment is as you
> mentioned
> > above:  connections marked as inactive by the live director, but packets
> > never get from the live director to any of the worker bees (as per many
> > tcpdumps on both hosts).
> >
> > Frustrating.
> >
> >
>
> --
> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
> generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>