|
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote:
As I understand it this is no problem for vrrp,
but heartbeat don't have the necessarry features builtin to handle the
problems switches and routers arp caches pose, which mean that if
ultramonkey is preffered, carp or vrrp should be implemented as well...
There are two layers to consider
o ip_vs
o ip and route management (heartbeat, vrrp which detect
changes in state and run a bunch of scripts)
To get active/active to work you need the layer 4 router
(here ip_vs) to allow active/active. The only way to do this
is with saru, which was a proof of principle project. Once
you have active/active working, you can manage failout any
way you want. Heartbeat and vrrp isn't what makes
active/active work.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
|
