|
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 11:11 -0300, Andre Nathan wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have an LVS-DR setup which is working correctly like this:
>
>
> +--------------+
> | LVS director |
> +--------------+
> / | \
> / | \
> / | \
> +---+ +---+
> | | | | ...
> +---+ +---+
> Real servers
>
>
> The director and the real servers are all on the same network (say,
> a.b.c.0/24) and share an IP address (say, a.b.c.d) for the load-balanced
> service.
>
> Now, we're migrating to a new range of IPs (say, x.y.z.0/24). I've tried
> adding a new real server (which has its real IP on the new range, say,
> x.y.z.w) to the existing configuration (that is, added a.b.c.d as an
> address to a dummy interface).
>
> The configuration seems to be working correctly (i.e., the connections
> are redirected to this new server). However, ipvsadm always reports the
> number of active connections as 0 for that server, and thus all new
> connections are being redirected to it, and none to the pre-existing
> servers (I'm using the wlc algorithm).
>
> Is this a supported configuration? Is there some assumption made by
> ipvsadm on the servers being all on the same network, or that dummy
> interface addresses and real addresses must be on the same network?
>
> The director kernel version is 2.6.12, and ipvsadm is 1.24.
Why don't you send output from these on your director:
ipvsadm -l --numeric
route -n
ifconfig
And maybe these on the one realserver:
route -n
ifconfig
> Thanks in advance,
> Andre
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
--
Vittorio R. Tracy <vrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fastmetrics LLC
|
