Re: Web vs Mail services

To: "isplist@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <isplist@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Web vs Mail services
Cc: lvs-users <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:12:44 +0900
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 10:01:45PM -0500, isplist@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> ]# ipvsadm -L -n
> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.0 (size=4096)
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
>   -> RemoteAddress:Port           Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> TCP wlc
> TCP wlc
> TCP wlc
>   ->             Route   1      0          0
>   ->             Route   1      0          0
> TCP wlc
> Actually, that is very interesting. It shows exactly what's happening. Only
> port 80 traffic has been able to get through, none of the others.

In that case, is http working ?

There are no real servers assigned to the other virtual services.
You are using keepalived, right? I guess its health checker thinks
that the real servers for the non-http virtual services are unavailable.
Perhaps because they aren't responding as keepalived expects.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>