Re: [lvs-users] Persistent Connections on a VS/NAT sertup.

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Persistent Connections on a VS/NAT sertup.
From: Christian Balzer <chibi@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:52:14 +0900
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 07:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, andylockran wrote:
> > If the user begins a SSL session negotation with one host, 
> > is that persistent by default,
> no
> > or is the -p option needed?
> that or the SH scheduler
The SH scheduler _would_ be the ideal solution if it wasn't broken in
regard to weight. So if you need/want the ability of LVS to gradually take
out a realserver without any user noticeable impact, SH is not for you.
Until it gets fixed at least. See the link below and take note of
the following silence of the lambs from the LVS developers. ^_-


Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer                NOC
chibi@xxxxxxx           Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Network Services

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>