Re: [lvs-users] Firewall clustering

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Firewall clustering
From: David Lang <david.lang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 11:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
take a look at CLUSTERIP with heartbeat/pacemaker, it may be what you really 

the usual way that LVS is used with pacemaker is that you have a HA pair of LVS 
laod balancer boxes that load balance across a farm of additional servers, but 
the LVS boxes themselves are active/bassive

David Lang

On Sun, 15 May 2011, CeR wrote:

> Hi there!
> I'm looking for some info about building firewall cluster active/active with
> load balancing.
> I previous worked with corosync+pacemaker+conntrack to get an active/passive
> cluster (without load balancing).
> Now, that I've started searching for documentation regarding load balancing
> I just find LVS stuff, so here I am.
> I wonder if someone can give me some clues about where or when or how LVS
> get along and/or works with pacemaker's stuff.
> Regards!

Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>