Re: [lvs-users] Firewall clustering

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Firewall clustering
From: CeR <cer.inet@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:54:56 +0200
> the usual way that LVS is used with pacemaker is that you have a HA pair of
> LVS laod balancer boxes that load balance across a farm of additional
> servers, but the LVS boxes themselves are active/bassive

Thanks, I will take a look?

No. CLUSTERIP only works on the INPUT chain, not on the forward chain.
> Believe me that you do not want to setup an active/active firewall, but an
> active/passive cluster.

What do you mean? Could you be more specific?
OK to not user CLUSTERIP. But what about an active/active cluster for
firewalling? Is there any problem?

/* Arturo Borrero González */
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>