Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ovf\s+scheduler\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ovf\s+scheduler\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 10:01:43 +0900; Thanks. I have applied this to the ipvs-next tree which is targeted at inclusion in Linux v4.3. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to maj; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00056.html (10,230 bytes)
2. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: Raducu Deaconu <rhadoo.io88@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:15:27 +0300; Hi, I have added entry for changelog , Thank you The weighted overflow scheduling algorithm directs network connections to the server with the highest weight that is currently available and overflows; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00055.html (18,712 bytes)
3. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:43:11 +0900; I am happy to do so, but Raducu, could you flesh out the changelog to describe what the new scheduler does. The Kconfig text (bellow) seems to provide the necessary information but I'd really like it; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00054.html (12,651 bytes)
4. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:16:40 +0300 (EEST); Hello, Thanks! Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> Simon, please apply the attached patch to -next tree after adding the "ipvs: " prefix. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00053.html (17,358 bytes)
5. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: Raducu Deaconu <rhadoo.io88@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:53:52 +0300; Hello, I have done the corrections. Signed-off-by: Raducu Deaconu <rhadoo.io88@xxxxxxxxx> -- net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig | 11 +++++ net/netfilter/ipvs/Makefile | 1 + net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ovf.c | 8; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00052.html (16,223 bytes)
6. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:27:21 +0300 (EEST); Hello, No worries. But one new problem... Indentation of this 'if' block should be fixed. It was correct in first patch. Also, change svc->af to Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscr; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00051.html (10,526 bytes)
7. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: Raducu Deaconu <rhadoo.io88@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:06:08 +0300; Hello, I have readjusted the patch, sorry for the code style issues, this is my first attempt at a contribution. Signed-off-by: Raducu Deaconu <rhadoo.io88@xxxxxxxxx> -- net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig |; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00050.html (15,949 bytes)
8. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:56:54 +0300 (EEST); Hello, When patch is attached it is difficult to comment it. Anyways, I'll try. - The Subject should include "ipvs: ", eg. Subject: [PATCH] ipvs: add ovf scheduler - In Kconfig the "tristate..." line; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00049.html (10,019 bytes)
9. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: Raducu Deaconu <rhadoo.io88@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:03:19 +0300; Hi, I have updated the code and generated the patch, according to your indications. Attachment: addovf.patch Description: Text Data; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00048.html (11,067 bytes)
10. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:11:25 +0300 (EEST); Hello, OK. But you have to update this scheduler because it is based on old code. You can use ip_vs_fo.c for reference. You have to fix any coding style warnings by using scripts/checkpatch.pl --stri; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00038.html (10,309 bytes)
11. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: "rhadoo.io88" <rhadoo.io88@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:29:15 +0300; Hi, Yes....adding thresholds support in ldirectord seems like a good ideea anyway... But perhaps there would be benefit in merging my proposed OVF scheduler with the existing FO, in essence they do t; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00037.html (13,064 bytes)
12. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:36:25 +0900; Hi, Perhaps ldirectord could be enhanced in this regard? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo i; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00034.html (11,782 bytes)
13. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: "rhadoo.io88" <rhadoo.io88@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 01:47:16 +0300; Unfortunately i was not aware of the FO scheduler, i looked it up just now...indeed you could get similar behavior with FO scheduler and proper thresholds. The only trouble with that is that i can't; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00033.html (10,796 bytes)
14. Re: ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:35:14 +0300 (EEST); Hello, Can the same be achieved by setting --u-threshold and using the FO scheduler? ip_vs_bind_dest() sets the IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD flag if number of connections exceed upper threshold and then the; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00032.html (9,534 bytes)
15. ovf scheduler (score: 1): Author: "rhadoo.io88" <rhadoo.io88@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:45:22 +0300; Hi, My name is Raducu Deaconu, i am a romanian syadmin/solution manager and i have been working with lvs for some years now, great software! I mainly use ldirectord on top of lvs and every now and th; /html/lvs-devel/2015-07/msg00031.html (12,797 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]