- 1. Re: [lvs-users] Glusterfs native nfs port for LVS (score: 1)
- Author: Filipe Cifali <cifali.filipe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 14:21:05 -0300
- I don't see a reason to put GlusterFS over LVS, since the client already loadbalance through the servers. How you mounted the GlusterFS on the client side? -- [ ]'s Filipe Cifali Stangler ___________
- /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00035.html (11,748 bytes)
- 2. Re: [lvs-users] Glusterfs native nfs port for LVS (score: 1)
- Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 08:36:15 -0500
- So why not just make it simple and ignore any tcp/udp ports, and make any connection to your VIP forward to the gluster server on the backend. Add persistence so connections to different ports from t
- /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00034.html (10,404 bytes)
- 3. Re: [lvs-users] Glusterfs native nfs port for LVS (score: 1)
- Author: yang feng <hoking.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 21:31:16 +0800
- Tomasz, Thanks for your help. I have three gluster nodes, it seems rpc.statd is random port.... What I want is to let LVS Loadbalance among those three nodes. [root@gluster02 ~]# netstat -tupna Activ
- /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00033.html (29,805 bytes)
- 4. Re: [lvs-users] Glusterfs native nfs port for LVS (score: 1)
- Author: Tomasz Chmielewski <tch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 14:04:16 +0100
- Use "-tupna", the output should be more readable. -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available a
- /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00032.html (22,675 bytes)
- 5. Re: [lvs-users] Glusterfs native nfs port for LVS (score: 1)
- Author: yang feng <hoking.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 20:38:12 +0800
- I can not tell which one should be gluster native nfs used port... [root@gluster02 ~]# netstat -a Active Internet connections (servers and established) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Addre
- /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00031.html (19,020 bytes)
- 6. Re: [lvs-users] Glusterfs native nfs port for LVS (score: 1)
- Author: Tomasz Chmielewski <tch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 13:12:45 +0100
- Can you check what netstat shows when it comes to open ports? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's
- /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00030.html (10,279 bytes)
- 7. [lvs-users] Glusterfs native nfs port for LVS (score: 1)
- Author: yang feng <hoking.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 10:04:16 +0800
- I am running gluster with native nfs, and want to configure loadbalance with LVS. I had successfully set up samba and glusterfs, but can not work with gluster native nfs. I had googled that gluster n
- /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00028.html (9,522 bytes)
- 8. [lvs-users] Glusterfs native nfs port for LVS (score: 1)
- Author: yang feng <hoking.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 23:13:07 +0800
- I am running gluster with native nfs, and want to configure loadbalance with LVS. I had successfully set up samba and glusterfs, but can not work with gluster native nfs. I had googled that gluster n
- /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00029.html (8,797 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu