Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+ldirectord\s+\+\s+mysql\s+woes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+ldirectord\s+\+\s+mysql\s+woes\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord + mysql woes (score: 1): Author: support@xxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:26:51 +0200; Thanks malcome for infos. I whuold just suggest to create an clean oss based ldirectord GIT same way as ipvsadm as my suggestion i pushed here to Horms and lvs folks +3 years ago . ldirectord HACKS c; /html/lvs-users/2015-07/msg00006.html (15,441 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord + mysql woes (score: 1): Author: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 09:37:55 +0100; Do you mean extended health checks? We have an example here of external checks with our version of ldirectord: http://blog.loadbalancer.org/ntlm-authenticating-proxy-check-script/ All of the code tha; /html/lvs-users/2015-07/msg00005.html (12,404 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord + mysql woes (score: 1): Author: support@xxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:13:52 +0200; @malcom , thats the pitty part of ldirectord , still till today . Ldirectord can not run more complex chat scripts . Maybe your Team mates take over that ldirectord developemnt too :-) and enhance it; /html/lvs-users/2015-07/msg00004.html (10,804 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord + mysql woes (score: 1): Author: Tom Hendrikx <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 23:50:45 +0200; Hi, Happily reporting that both scenarios work now. When using two real servers with unbalanced load, I had to set the 'standby' server to take at least 1 weight unit (0 didn't work). So working conf; /html/lvs-users/2015-07/msg00001.html (21,109 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord + mysql woes (score: 1): Author: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 18:34:46 +0100; Tom, LVS certainly won't care what the traffic is but you probably need some kind of connection reset to make the new mysql server re-negotiate with the client. It may be your application that is con; /html/lvs-users/2015-06/msg00020.html (20,903 bytes)
6. Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord + mysql woes (score: 1): Author: Tom Hendrikx <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:38:31 +0200; Hi Malcolm, I've tried this too, but it seemed that mysql on the fallback instance received garbage. That is why I stated that it seems like the fallback is explicitly designed for http traffic only.; /html/lvs-users/2015-06/msg00019.html (18,505 bytes)
7. Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord + mysql woes (score: 1): Author: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:04:11 +0100; Tom, I think you are just looking for the fallback functionality. i.e. if my one server dies then use the fallback server. -- Regards, Malcolm Turnbull. Loadbalancer.org Ltd. Phone: +44 (0)330 160454; /html/lvs-users/2015-06/msg00018.html (16,995 bytes)
8. Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord + mysql woes (score: 1): Author: support@xxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 21:02:20 +0200; Hello Tom, remove any sql real node weight's and use wrr scheduler , see below. I had used sutch ldirectord +mysql setup some years ago .... see old howto : https://www.howtoforge.com/loadbalanced_my; /html/lvs-users/2015-06/msg00014.html (14,704 bytes)
9. [lvs-users] ldirectord + mysql woes (score: 1): Author: Tom Hendrikx <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 12:34:14 +0200; Hi, I've been trying to get mysql failover working using ldirectord. The general idea is to have 2 mysql instances running in master-master setup (works), then have a ldirectord in front of that send; /html/lvs-users/2015-06/msg00011.html (9,657 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]