|
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 05:25:16PM +0200, Rumen Bogdanovski wrote:
> I was thinking about some cosmetics by using currently unused
> connection flag IP_VS_CONN_F_SYNC and introducing dest.syncconns (sync
> connection counter). This way we should introduce additional field in
> /proc/net/ip_vs and make it show dest.syncconns in addition to
> inactconns and activeconns. Also a new field in /proc/net/ip_vs_conn
> to designate whether it is a local or sync connection should be added.
> IMHO this way it should be much nicer and more informative to the
> user. However changing this will not be well accepted (I guess), so I
> have other idea: to introduce /proc/net/ip_vs_sync and
> /proc/net/ip_vs_conn_sync to show only syncconns the same way
> /proc/net/ip_vs and /proc/net/ip_vs_conn does. I can work on this in
> my free time if one of the ideas is accepted.
>
> Do you like the idea? I am waiting for comments.
Hi,
yes, I like the idea. But for compatibility reasons I think that for
compatibility reasons we will have to go with the /proc/net/ip_vs_sync
and /proc/net/ip_vs_conn_sync version of the idea.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
|
