|
Julius Volz wrote:
Add the implementation of the new Generic Netlink interface to IPVS and keep
the old set/getsockopt interface for userspace backwards compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Julius Volz <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Just a few quick comments, will try to do a full review later:
+ * Policy used for commands that operate on service, destination
+ * or daemon entries
+ */
+static struct nla_policy ip_vs_entries_policy[IPVS_ENTRY_ATTR_MAX + 1]
+__read_mostly = {
These can all be const (and have the __read_mostly annotation removed).
+static int ip_vs_genl_fill_stats(struct sk_buff *skb, int container_type,
+ struct ip_vs_stats *stats)
+{
+ struct nlattr *nl_stats = nla_nest_start(skb, container_type);
+ if (!nl_stats)
+ goto nla_put_failure;
Unbalanced locking.
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&stats->lock);
+
+ NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_CONNS, stats->conns);
+ NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_INPKTS, stats->inpkts);
+ NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_OUTPKTS, stats->outpkts);
+ NLA_PUT_U64(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_INBYTES, stats->inbytes);
+ NLA_PUT_U64(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_OUTBYTES, stats->outbytes);
+ NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_CPS, stats->cps);
+ NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_INPPS, stats->inpps);
+ NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_OUTPPS, stats->outpps);
+ NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_INBPS, stats->inbps);
+ NLA_PUT_U32(skb, IPVS_STATS_ATTR_OUTBPS, stats->outbps);
+
+ spin_unlock_bh(&stats->lock);
+
+ nla_nest_end(skb, nl_stats);
+
+ return 0;
+
+nla_put_failure:
+ spin_unlock_bh(&stats->lock);
+
+ nla_nest_cancel(skb, nl_stats);
+ return -EMSGSIZE;
+}
+
+static int ip_vs_genl_set_cmd(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
+{
+ struct ip_vs_service *svc;
+ struct ip_vs_service_user usvc;
+ struct ip_vs_dest_user udest;
+ int ret = 0, cmd, flags;
+ int need_full_svc = 0, need_full_dest = 0;
+
+ cmd = info->genlhdr->cmd;
+ flags = info->nlhdr->nlmsg_flags;
+
+ /* increase the module use count */
+ ip_vs_use_count_inc();
This looks fishy - the reference probably must be taken by
genetlink before calling the command handler.
+int ip_vs_genl_register(void)
+{
+ int ret, i;
+
+ ret = genl_register_family(&ip_vs_genl_family);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ip_vs_genl_ops); i++) {
+ ret = genl_register_ops(&ip_vs_genl_family, &ip_vs_genl_ops[i]);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_out;
+ }
+ return 0;
+
+err_out:
+ genl_unregister_family(&ip_vs_genl_family);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+void ip_vs_genl_unregister(void)
+{
+ genl_unregister_family(&ip_vs_genl_family);
Doesn't it also has to unregister the ops?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
