|
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008, Julius Volz wrote:
>
>> So maybe it would already work? ;)
>
> No. Some highly motivated people tried doing SNAT on OUTPUT in an attempt to
> do F5-SNAT and it didn't work. This lead to the write up in
>
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.non-modified_realservers.html#F5_snat
>
> which brings us to where we are now.
Thanks for the info! Right, I even said myself in the previous reply
that ip_vs_postrouting() stops further processing in the POSTROUTING
chain, so it never reaches netfilter NAT code.
I still think an in-IPVS SNAT would be nice anyways... don't know if
I'll find the time to hack on it soon, though.
Julius
--
Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps
Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-020.4.028.116-1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
