|
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:52:22 +1000
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:04:28PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Chris Snook <csnook@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:37:33 -0400
> > >
> > >> Julius Volz wrote:
> > >> > Since IPVS now does partial IPv6, should we finally move it from
> > >> > "net/ipv4/ipvs" to "net" or to "net/netfilter"? I posted that patch a
> > >> > long time ago, but that was before any of the actual v6 features, so
> > >> > there was probably no interest.
> > >>
> > >> Whatever the netfilter people want is fine with me.
> > >
> > > I think, especially in the long term, putting IPVS under net/netfilter/
> > > is the right thing to do.
> >
> > Ok thanks, I'll send the patch for that once lvs-next-2.6 or
> > net-next-2.6 builds for ARCH=um again (there seems to be some breakage
> > at the moment)...
>
> Once net-next-2.6 is working again, let me know and I'll pull it
> into lvs-next-2.6.
I can't fix this if people don't tell me what the problem is.
Is there some upstream fix and cures this and all I need to do is
sync net-next-2.6 up with Linus's tree? Is there some external
fix?
It's totally stupid to stall development because of an issue like this
yet give no direction or diagnostics we can use as a path to resolve
it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
